If a part or assembly does not pass inspection, it enters

If a part or assembly does not pass inspection, it enters

• A. Non-conformance management (NCM) system
• B. Corrective action log
• C. Quality improvement register
• D. Inspection history

Answer: (A)

When a part or assembly fails inspection, the event is captured in a formal non-conformance management system to create a complete, auditable record of the defect and its lifecycle. The NCM system is specifically designed to log the failure with details like part number, serial/lot, inspection data, defect type, and severity, then guide the flow from disposition (scrap, rework, or accept with deviation) through root-cause analysis and corrective actions. This centralizes tracking, assigns ownership, and links the issue to related data (suppliers, drawings, approvals) so audits and regulatory requirements are met and trends can be analyzed for ongoing quality improvements. A corrective action log, by contrast, is typically used to document actions taken to address issues after they’re identified, and may be a component of the NCM process rather than the primary place where the defect is first recorded. The quality improvement register is oriented more toward broader process-improvement ideas and initiatives, not the specific tracking and resolution of individual non-conformances. The inspection history shows past inspection results, but does not manage the defect’s lifecycle from detection through disposition and CAPA.

When a part or assembly fails inspection, the event is captured in a formal non-conformance management system to create a complete, auditable record of the defect and its lifecycle. The NCM system is specifically designed to log the failure with details like part number, serial/lot, inspection data, defect type, and severity, then guide the flow from disposition (scrap, rework, or accept with deviation) through root-cause analysis and corrective actions. This centralizes tracking, assigns ownership, and links the issue to related data (suppliers, drawings, approvals) so audits and regulatory requirements are met and trends can be analyzed for ongoing quality improvements.

A corrective action log, by contrast, is typically used to document actions taken to address issues after they’re identified, and may be a component of the NCM process rather than the primary place where the defect is first recorded. The quality improvement register is oriented more toward broader process-improvement ideas and initiatives, not the specific tracking and resolution of individual non-conformances. The inspection history shows past inspection results, but does not manage the defect’s lifecycle from detection through disposition and CAPA.